A person who appears to be ambling aimlessly, but is secretly in search of adventure.

4.06.2009

The economics of a good party

A few Sundays ago in The Washington Post, David Fahrenthold wondered whether art could really stimulate the economy. As part of the stimulus package, the NEA will filter $50 million through various arts groups but will require "grant applicants to detail how their art projects will either save jobs or boost the work prospects of freelance artists." Fahrenthold asked several artists how they would spend the money and though he didn't ask me, here's what I think.

First, I suggest Fahrenthold and everyone at the NEA read a phenomenal book called The Warhol Economy by Elizabeth Currid, which demonstrates that creative economies are driven by good parties. Creatives do not operate within a traditional 9 to 5 office environment. They are at their best between the hours of 5 pm and 9 am, and when they are in social environments surrounded by others like them. It's called the economics of a good party.

Then I suggest the NEA direct some of the stimulus package money to supporting art and music happenings like Cherry Blast, which will take place in Anacostia on Friday. It's a great art project that will boost the work prospects of many freelance artists from around the city.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Rob Bettmann said...

Dig it. Arts funding does make economic sense. It's why Toronto increased public arts funding even though they're cutting other funding. http://www.thestar.com/Entertainment/article/612812

9:22 PM

 
Blogger Frederic said...

Here are Chuck Close thoughts on the subject:
http://bigthink.com/topics/art/ideas/chuck-close-justifies-public-art-expenditures

9:49 AM

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home